UNLEASHING THE POWER OF SUPERVISORY FEEDBACK IN ACADEMIC WRITING: STRATEGIES FOR TIMELY UNDERGRADUATE THESIS COMPLETION
Downloads
Despite its critical importance in academic writing, effective feedback strategies in undergraduate thesis supervision remains under-researched. This case study aims to address this gap by examining the experiences of five English department students who completed their theses and the strategies their supervisors employed to facilitate timely completion. Utilizing semi-structured interviews and text analysis, the study addresses three key research questions: 1) how feedback is formulated; 2) what strategies are employed by supervisors; and 3) what are the students’ perception of the strategies. The findings indicate that most feedback was formulated as directive, and the supervisors’ strategies include timely, personalized feedback and additional supervision time. The strategies help improve student engagement, motivation, and thesis outcomes. The students also positively perceived the supervisors’ strategies. This study contributes mainly by highlighting the role of emotional support in thesis supervision, the dominance of directive feedback in fostering timely completion, and the importance of personalized, timely feedback for student engagement. Additionally, it emphasizes that supervisors need to employ strategic, multifaceted approaches that combine academic guidance with emotional encouragement.
Downloads
Abdelhafez, A. M. M. (2018). The effect of a blended-learning course in EFL teaching on developing student teachers ’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpck) and motivation. Journal of Research in Education and Psychology, 33(4), 0–37. https://search.emarefa.net/en/detail/BIM-952800-the-effect-oi-a-blended-learning-course-in-efl-teaching-on-d
Abdulkhaleq, M. M. A., Tan, B. H., & Abdullah, F. S. (2013). Oral feedback in face-to-face conferencing on EFL postgraduate students’ thesis drafts. The English Teacher, XLII(3), 152–173. https://meltajournals.com/index.php/TET/article/view/102
Abrar, M., Fajaryani, N., Hutabarat, R. R., Failasofah, F., & Masbirorotni, M. (2023). EFL student teachers’ experiences in writing their undergraduate theses in Jambi. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 401–416. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.210 93/ijeltal.v7i2.1404
Adedokun, T., & Oyetunde-Joshua, F. (2024). Strengthening student-supervisor relationships: an examination of postgraduate students’ perspectives on supervisory supports. JMSP (Jurnal Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 8(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v8i22024p95
Ädel, A., Skogs, J., Lindgren, C., & Stridfeldt, M. (2023). The supervisor and student in bachelor thesis supervision: a broad repertoire of sometimes conflicting roles. European Journal of Higher Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2162560
Adrefiza, A., & Fortunasari, F. (2020). Written corrective feedback on students’ thesis writing: an analysis of student-supervisory interactions. JELTIM (Journal of English Language Teaching Innovation and Materials), 2(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v2i1.37317
Afful, J. B. A., Ngula, R. S., Twumasi, R., Tetteh, G., & Mensah, F. (2022). Supervisors’ perceptions of postgraduate students’ thesis literature review writing in a Ghanaian University. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(1), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.91.11120
Akbar, S., Putri, Y. K., & Rizdanti, S. (2023). Analysis of factors affecting students’ adversity quotient on completing undergraduate thesis. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3011
Al Ajmi, Z., Al Na’abi, A., Alrawahi, A. H., Al Saadoon, M., Al Balushi, H. D., Alhabsi, F., & Babiker, H. A. (2023). Student and supervisor perspective on undergraduate research in a teaching-intensive setting in Oman. Education Sciences, 13(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040346
Aldosari, D. M., & Ibrahim, A. S. (2019). The relationship between interpersonal approaches of thesis supervisors and graduate student satisfaction. International Education Studies, 12(10), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p96
Amani, J., Myeya, H., & Mhewa, M. (2022). Understanding the motives for pursuing postgraduate studies and causes of late completion: Supervisors and supervisees’ experiences. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221109586
Ani, A. (2019). Positive feedback improves students psychologiscal and physical learning outcome. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies (Ijes), 22(2), 144–152. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/index.php/Insani/index
Azman, H., Nor, N. F. M., Nor, N. F. M., & Aghwela, H. O. M. (2014). Investigating supervisory feedback practices and their impact on international research student’s thesis development: A case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.028
Barus, G. (2022). Investigating three factors of supporting acceleration student thesis writing. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 12(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2022.v12.i2
Bastola, M. N. (2020). Engagement and challenges in supervisory feedback : Supervisors ’ and students ’ perceptions. RELC Journal, 53(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220912547
Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2021). Influences on and impact of motives for supervising master’s theses: A multiple-case study. Teaching and Researching Chinese EFL/ESL Learners in Higher Education, August, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178118-2-3
Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
Bayona-Oré, S. (2018). Supervisor performance and thesis development in postgraduate students. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234825.3236334
Bearman, M., Tai, J., Henderson, M., Esterhazy, R., Mahoney, P., & Molloy, E. (2024). Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2307332
Beattie, E. (2022). The power of the positive: Enhancing online student engagement for adult literacy learners. Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy, 4(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.35847/ebeattie.4.1.20
Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Meyer, H. (2011). Best practice in supervisor feedback to thesis students. https://ako.ac.nz/assets/Knowledge-centre/NPF-08-002-Best-Practice-in-Supervisor-Feedback-to-Thesis-Writers/RESEARCH-REPORT-Best-Practice-in-Supervisor-Feedback-to-Thesis-Students.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Budiawan, D. S., Hamamah, H., & Isnaini, M. H. (2022). Exploring the use of direct corrective feedback on writing an undergraduate thesis. Linguista: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 6(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.25273/linguista.v6i1.13056
Cao, F., Li, H., Chen, X., You, Y., & Xue, Y. (2024). Who matters and why ? The contributions of different sources of social support to doctoral students ’ academic engagement. European Journal of Education, 59(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12649
Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘ Ignoring me is part of learning ’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International ISSN:, 54(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104
Casado-Lumbreras, C., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2014). Online coaching in thesis supervision : A qualitative study. Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality-TEEM’14, 489–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2669711.2669944
Chugh, R., Macht, S., & Harreveld, B. (2022). Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1955241
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry research design choosing among five approaches (4th Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
de Kleijn, R. A. M., Mainhard, M. T., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2013). Master’s thesis projects: Student perceptions of supervisor feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.777690
Diasti, K. S., & Mbato, C. L. (2020). Exploring undergraduate students’ motivation-regulation strategies in thesis writing. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 14(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v14i2.23450
Duncan, J. E. (2024). How can I help? A less-is-more-approach to responsible, supportive and sustainable, doctoral supervision. Hogre Utbildning, 14(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v14.4075
Dwihandini, L. A., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suarnajaya, I. W. (2013). The analysis of the factors affecting undergraduate students ’ difficulties in writing thesis in the English department of Mahasaraswati University. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2, 1–12. https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_bahasa/article/view/903
Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41(September 2018), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005
Enita, S., & Sumardi, S. (2023). Dialogic feedback on graduate students ’ thesis writing supervision : Voices of Indonesian graduate students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2614
Fleckenstein, J., Liebenow, L. W., & Meyer, J. (2023). Automated feedback and writing: a multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6(2023), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454
Flick, U. (2014). Introduction to qualitative research (4th Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
Ganapathy, M., Ai Lin tan, D., & Phan, J. (2020). Impact of written corrective feedback on malaysian ESL secondary students’ writing performance. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(3), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2603-11
Gedamu, A. D. (2018). TEFL graduate supervisees’ views of their supervisors’ supervisory styles and satisfaction with thesis supervision. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.30466/ ijltr.2018.20490
Geng, F., & Yu, S. (2022). Exploring doctoral students’ emotions in feedback on academic writing: a critical incident perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 46(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2109616
Ginting, E. S., & Hutasoit, A. H. (2020). Factors affecting students’ thesis completion on department of management STIE Mikroskil. 27(2), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v27i2.843
Grohnert, T., Gromotka, L., Gast, I., Delnoij, L., & Beausaert, S. (2023). Effective master’s thesis supervision – A summative framework for research and practice. Educational Research Review, 42((2024)100589), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100589
Harreveld, B., Danaher, M., Lawson, C., Knight, B. A., & Busch, G. (2016). Constructing methodology for qualitative research: Researching education and social practices. Springer Nature.
Haven, T., Bouter, L., Mennen, L., & Tijdink, J. (2023). Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates. Accountability in Research, 30(8), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2071153
Henderson, M., Ryan, T., & Phillips, M. (2019). The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815
Henttonen, A., Ahlberg, K., Scheja, M., Fossum, B., & Westerbotn, M. (2023). Students’ ways of experiencing writing a bachelor’s thesis: a phenomenographic interview study. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(7), 1640–1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2174085
Jiang, S., & Yan, X. (2020). Research on the effect of supervisor feedback for undergraduate thesis writing. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n1p43
Josh McCarthy. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153–169. https://www.iier.org.au/iier25/mccarthy.html
Jusslin, S., & Widlund, A. (2024). Academic writing workshop-ing to support students writing bachelor’s and master’s theses: a more-than-human approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973409
Karlsholm, G., André, B., & Grønning, K. (2024). Supervising undergraduate nursing students on their bachelor’s thesis. A qualitative study. SAGE Open Nursing, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231226074
Khan, M. E. I., Khan, M. E. I., Anonna, A. S., & Islam, S. (2023). Challenges of topic selection for dissertation at the undergraduate level in Bangladesh. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v3i2.120
Khosa, A., Wilkin, C., & Burch, S. (2024). PhD students’ relatedness, motivation, and well-being with multiple supervisors. Accounting Education, 33(2), 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2023.2179889
Khuram, W., Wang, Y., Ali, M., & Khalid, A. (2023). Impact of Supportive Supervisor on Doctoral Students ’ Research Productivity : The Mediating Roles of Academic Engagement and Academic Psychological Capital. SAGE Open, 13(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231185554
Kreber, C., & Wealer, C. (2023). Intentions, concepts and conceptions of research supervision: a consideration of three disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1900815
Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415433
Lei, Z., & Pramoolsook, I. (2020). Written supervisory feedback strategies on bachelor’s theses: Chinese EFL supervisors’ beliefs and practices. REFLections, 27(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i2.247274
Leo, S. (2021). The contribution of feedback contents to the development of student thesis. Barista : Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Dan Pariwisata, 8(2), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.34013/barista.v8i2.268
Li, Y., Hyland, F., & Hu, G. (2017). Prompting MEd students to engage with academia and the professional world through feedback. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26(March 2017), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.02.005
Lindsay, S. (2015). What works for doctoral students in completing their thesis? Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974025
Lumbantobing, M. A. (2022). Student satisfaction with thesis guidance service of the mechanical engineering education study program, University of Palangkaraya. Khidmatuna: Journal of Research and Community Service, 1(2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.58330/khidmatuna.v2i1.229
Luna-Hernández, A. (2016). Motivation and its influence on oral communication in the English language in college students. Ciencias de La Educación, 2(2), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.23857/dc.v2i2.51
Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Malaga-Toboła, U., Kocira, S., & Szparaga, A. (2019). The use of information sources and online databases for writing theses by students of selected studies. E3S Web of Conference, 132, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /201913201017
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 1–30. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85654/
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
Mukhlis, K., & Syukri, S. (2020). Types of written commentary feedback on EFL students’ L2 writing. Al Lughowiyat, 1(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.31332/alg.v1i2.2282
Nasiri, F., & Mafakheri, F. (2014). Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1962–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914906
Neupane Bastola, M. (2021). Formulation of feedback comments: Insights from supervisory feedback on master’s theses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1804985
Neupane Bastola, M. (2022). Engagement and challenges in supervisory feedback: Supervisors’ and students’ perceptions. RELC Journal, 53(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220912547
Nurjati, N., & Bandjarjani, W. (2023). Exploring abstract writing in the EFL undergraduate theses: A construction-based analysis. Anaphora : Journal of Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v6i1.8598
Nurkamto, J., Djatmika, & Prihandoko, L. A. (2022). Students’ problems of academic writing competencies, challenges in online thesis supervision, and the solutions: Thesis supervisors’ perspectives. TEFLIN Journal, 33(1), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i1/123-147
O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795
Oanh, M.A., N. T. H. (2024). The Impact of feedback on first-year university students’ writing development: A study at a university in Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(08), 6689–6697. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-107
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2019). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language; A handbook for supervisors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170022
Pare, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In Doctoral Education: Research-Based Strategies for Doctoral Students, Supervisors and Administrators (pp. 59–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_4
Prameswara, T. J., & Hapsari, A. (2023). EFL learners’ motivation in writing their undergraduate thesis. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 5(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v5i1.2636
Puspita, C. (2019). Factors affecting students’ difficulties in writing thesis. 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 13–22. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/4683
Rantala, L., Ruohotie-Lyhty, K., & Maria. (2022). Bachelor’s thesis writing as an emotional process. Writing & Pedagogy, 14(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21145
Rizwan, M. S. M., & Naas, A. R. F. (2022). Factors affecting undergraduates’ difficulties in writing thesis. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 3(10), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.2022.3.10.14
Roberts, C., & Laura Hyatt. (2019). The dissertation jurney: A practical and comprehensive guide to planning, writing, and defending your dissertation. Sage Publications, Inc.
Rowena Murray. (2011). How to write a thesis (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
Sa’diah, S., Rukmayadi, Y., Shofiyah Tanjung, K., Puji Lestari, N., & Rizki, A. (2023). Problems and strategies in developing writing undergraduate thesis: A study in EFL students. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 15(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v15i2.7890
Saeed, M. A., Al Qunayeer, H. S., & AL-Jaberi, M. A. (2021). Exploring supervisory feedback formulation on academic writing of research proposals and postgraduates’ responses to feedback: A case study. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007125
Seeber, M., & Horta, H. (2021). No road is long with good company. What factors affect Ph.D. student’s satisfaction with their supervisor? Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 15(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-10-2020-0044
Sonmez Aydin, F., Aktas, Ş., & Yayli, D. (2023). Examining thesis writing process in an English language teaching program in Turkey: Supervisor support and power relations. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 59, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1369237
Sosibo, L. (2013). The effects of supervisors’ formative feedback: Reflections of students in a postgraduate programme. PULA: Botswana Journal of African Studies, 27(2), 254–270. https://journals.ub.bw/index.php/pula/article/view/527
Stappenbelt, B., & Basu, A. (2019). Student-supervisor-university expectation alignment in the undergraduate engineering thesis. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.482
Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2010). Feedback and self-regulated learning: Insights from supervisors’ and PhD examiners’ reports. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903525140
Strebel, F., Gürtler, S., Hulliger, B., & Lindeque, J. (2021). Laissez-faire or guidance? Effective supervision of bachelor theses. Studies in Higher Education, 46(4), 866–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1659762
Suarga, S., Jusriana, A., & Ulfa, S. (2023). The influence of supervisor performance on the quality of student thesis. Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(1), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v7i1.35878
Sukarsono, Rahayu, N. S., & Syahsurya, M. A. (2023). “I have to take a deep breath”: Emotional geography of EFL lecturers during undergraduate thesis supervision. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 10(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i2.1137
Teklesellassie, Y. (2019). Views of summer TEFL postgraduate students and their supervisors on the practice of thesis supervision in the Ethiopian context. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 58(1), 131–165. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.58.1.6
Tira Nur Fitria. (2019). Analysis of EFL students’ difficulties in writing and completing English thesis. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i1.3607
Tremblay-Wragg, E., Mathieu Chartier, S., Labonté-Lemoyne, E., Déri, C., & Gadbois, M. E. (2021). Writing more, better, together: how writing retreats support graduate students through their journey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1736272
van Tienoven, T. P., Glorieux, A., Minnen, J., te Braak, P., & Spruyt, B. (2022). Graduate students locked down? PhD students’ satisfaction with supervision during the first and second COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium. PLoS ONE, 17(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268923
Wirawan, S., Chojimah, N., & Sugiharyanti, E. (2022). Directive speech acts represented as teacher feedback at Indonesian higher education level. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes (JEASP), 5(2), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.18860/jeasp.v5i2.18996
Xu, L. (2017). Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1237483
Xu, L., & Hu, J. (2020). Language feedback responses, voices and identity (re)construction: Experiences of Chinese international doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1593214
Yazdani, S., & Alimorad, Z. (2022). Discursive construction of master’s students’ scholarly position during supervisory interactions: An appraisal perspective. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2022.17422
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2013). Understanding supervisors’ commentary practices in doctoral research proposal writing: A Hong Kong study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0046-9
Yunita, W., & B. D Kusuma, L. (2023). Student’ preferences on the focus of feedback in writing research proposals. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Science and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2021), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-19-0_17
Zheng, Y., Yu, S., Wang, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis : Insights from a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1617181
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Syafi’i, Ahmad Munir, Syafi’ul Anam, Suhartono Suhartono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
