DESIGNING LITERACY E-COACHING MODEL FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN INDONESIA

Ilza Mayuni; Eva Leiliyanti; Tara Mustikaning Palupi; Mei Lusiana Sitorus; Yinghuei Chen

doi:10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i2/310-329

Authors

Ilza Mayuni Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0185-4716
Eva Leiliyanti Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0425-3203
Tara Mustikaning Palupi Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-937X
Mei Lusiana Sitorus Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8407-4968
Yinghuei Chen
ychen52@asia.edu.tw
Asia University, Taiwan, Taiwan, Province of China http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-1717

Vol. 33 No. 2 (2022)

Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Author Biographies
Metrics
References

This multi-year study which took place in 2019-2021 aims to design a literacy e-coaching model for EFL Junior High School teachers in Indonesia in support of the government-initiated school-based literacy movement program. The study involved 150 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers from 16 provinces in Indonesia in the need analysis part, 12 teachers in the module development part and 41 teachers in the implementation part. Two kinds of modules were developed during the study, namely: (1) a literacy enrichment module to reinforce the participants’ literacy content knowledge; and (2) a literacy learning module to enhance the participants’ competence in teaching literacy. Afterwards, two coaching cycles using the modules were implemented. The coaching cycles were designed by adapting the coaching models from Rogers and Rogers (2007) and Trinh et al. (2011), as well as adopting the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (2017) model. Data was collected from questionnaires, tests, observations, videos, expert judgment, and discussion groups and analyzed using model validation, descriptive and inferential statistics. The study found that the literacy e-coaching model enhanced the participants’ competences in literacy teaching, as the results demonstrated the amalgamation of the models to be effective.

Mayuni, I., Leiliyanti, E., Palupi, T. M., Sitorus, M. L., & Chen, Y. (2022). DESIGNING LITERACY E-COACHING MODEL FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN INDONESIA. TEFLIN Journal, 33(2), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i2/310-329

Download Citation

Antoro, B., Boeriswati, E., & Leiliyanti, E. (2021). Hubungan antara kegiatan literasi dengan prestasi belajar siswa di SMP Negeri 107 Jakarta [The relation between literacy activities and students’ learning achievement at SMP Negeri 107 Jakarta]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v6i2.2394

Batt, E. (2010). Cognitive coaching: A critical phase in professional development to implement sheltered instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(4), 997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.042

Bautista, A., & Oretga-Ruiz, R. (2017). Teacher Professional Development: International Perspectives and Approaches. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 240-251. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.1020

Berg, M. E., & Karlsen, J. T. (2007). Mental models in project management coaching. Engineering Management Journal, 19(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2007.11431736

Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/653468

Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378–411. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.36.4.3

Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev

Dozier, C. (2006). Responsive literacy coaching tools for creating and sustaining purposeful change. Stenhouse Publishers.

Echevarria, J., Richards-Tutor, C., Canges, R., & Francis, D. (2011). Using the SIOP model to promote the acquisition of language and science concepts with English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.623600

Echevarria, J, Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2017). Making content comprehensible for English learners: SIOP (5th ed.). Pearson.

Fadda, H. (2020). Implementation of the Sheltered Instructional Observation Protocol (SIOP) model in the Saudi classroom: EFL teachers’ perspectives. Arab World English Journal, 11(2). 339-360. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.24.

Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Wadsworth.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Hsieh, W. Y., Hemmeter, M. L., McCollum, J. A., & Ostrosky, M. M. (2009). Using coaching to increase preschool teachers’ use of emergent literacy teaching strategies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.03.007

Ives, Y. (2008). What is 'coaching'? An exploration of conflicting paradigms. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 6(2), 100-113. https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/ed490c36-e4c1-4263-ad7b-24cc99b97b04/1/

Kiong, T. T., Yunos, J. B. M., Mohammad, B. Bin, Othman, W. B., Heong, Y. M., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2012). The development and evaluation of the qualities of Buzan mind mapping module. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.264

Kotze, J., Fleisch, B., &Taylor, S. (2018). Alternative forms of early grade instructional coaching: Emerging evidence from field experiments in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.09.004

Landry, S. H., Anthony, J. L., Swank, P. R., & Monseque-Bailey, P. (2009). Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013842

Lindfors, J. W. (1999). Children’s inquiry: Using language to make sense of the world. Teachers College Press.

Lourdes, M., & Tan, G. (2019). An evaluation of DepEd-produced grade 7 biology modules by biology experts and science teachers. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (IJISME), 27(5), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.27.05.003

Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and Education, 22(3), 222. https://doi.org/10.2167/le778.0

Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: ‘Genre-based’ literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 123–155). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Mayuni, I., Leiliyanti, E., Agustina, N., Yulianti, V., Chen, Y., & Chu, F.-I. (2020). School literacy movement and its implications towards students’ learning: A comparative case study in Jakarta and Taiwan. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4 Special Issue), 1555–1569. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/6937

Mills, K.A. (2010). A review of the "digital turn" in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246-271. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364401

Moran, M. C. (2007). Differentiated literacy coaching: Scaffolding for student and teacher success (1st ed.). Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

Neuman, S. B. & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532-566, https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208328088

Nystrand, M. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 392–412. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171709

Pitcher, S. M., & Mackey, B. (2013). Collaborating for real literacy: Librarian, teacher, and principal (2nd ed.). Linworth.

Pletcher, B. C., Hudson, A. K., John, L., & Scott, A. (2019). Coaching on borrowed time: Balancing the roles of the literacy professional. The Reading Teacher, 72(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1777

Powell, D. R., & Diamond, K. E. (2013). Implementation fidelity of a literacy and language instruction. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(2), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113516678

Powell, D. R., Steed, E. A., & Diamond, K. E. (2010). Dimensions of literacy coaching with head start teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121409341197

Resnick, L., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well structured) talk builds the mind. In D. Pressis & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 163-194). Springer.

Rodgers, E. M., & Pinnel, G. S. (Eds). (2002). Learning from teaching in literacy education: New perspectives on professional development. Heinemann.

Rodgers, A., & Rodgers, E. M. (2007). The effective literacy coach: Using inquiry to support teaching and learning. Teachers College Press.

Rogayan Jr., D. V., & Dollete, L. F. (2019). Development and validation of physical science workbook for senior high school. Science Education International, 30(4), 84–290. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.5

Shi, Y., Zaier, A., & Maina, F. (2020). Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol model: An effective way of promoting teacher candidates’ self-efficacy in teaching English language learners. The International Journal of Diversity in Education, 21(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0020/cgp/v21i02/1-17

Short, D. J. (2017). How to integrate content and language learning effectively for English language learners. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7b). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00806a

Short, D. J., Echevarría, J., & Richards-Tutor, C. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401155

Short, D. J., Fidelman, C. G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in English language learners through sheltered instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 334-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.20

Song, K. H. (2016). Applying an SIOP-based instructional framework for professional development in Korea. TESL-EJ, 20(1), 1-26. https://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume20/ej77/ej77a3/

Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us : Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001

Toll, C. A. (2014). The literacy coach’s survival guide. Essential questions and practical answers. International Reading Association.

Torrefranca, E. C. (2017). Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations. The Normal Lights, 11(1), 43–73. https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/normallights/article/view/375

Trinh, L., Ngo, C., & Laws, K. (2011). The impact of coaching on in-service teachers’ professionalism in developing and using evaluative questions in Vietnamese secondary education. In K. Laws, L. Harbon, & R. Fielding (Eds.), Teacher professional development in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from Indonesia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam (pp. 1–135). Kevin Laws, Lesley Harbon, Ruth Fielding.

Trinh, Q. L., Minh, C. N., & Laws, K. (2011). The impact of coaching on in-service teachers’ professionalism in developing and using evaluative questions in Vietnamese secondary education. In K. Laws, L. Harbon, & R. Fielding (Eds.), Teacher Professional Development in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from Indonesia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam. K. Laws, L. Harbon & R. Fielding.

Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.

Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2004). The literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research-based practice. The Guildford Press.

Weber-Mayrer, M. M., Piasta, S. B., Ottley, J. R., Justice, L. M., & O’Connell, A. A. (2018). Early childhood literacy coaching: An examination of coaching intensity and changes in educators’ literacy knowledge and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.013

DESIGNING LITERACY E-COACHING MODEL FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN INDONESIA

Authors

Downloads

Ilza Mayuni, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Eva Leiliyanti, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Tara Mustikaning Palupi, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Mei Lusiana Sitorus, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Yinghuei Chen, Asia University, Taiwan

Downloads

Login

Scopus Indexing

IndexedBy

Indexed on

Visitors

Statistics

indexing

Address

Contact Info: