DEMYSTIFYING STUDENT-UNIVERSITY IDENTIFICATION AMONG VIRTUAL TEFL CANDIDATES: THE CASE OF IRAN

Esmaeel Ali Salimi; Zahra Banitalebi

doi:10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/97-115

Authors

Esmaeel Ali Salimi Allameh Tabataba’i University, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Zahra Banitalebi
zahra.banitalebi@gmail.com
Allameh Tabataba'i University, Iran, Islamic Republic of http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-9669

Vol. 34 No. 1 (2023)

Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References

Student-University Identification (SUI) of virtual students in higher education is one area of identity that receives less attention. This study aimed to explore the SUI of a purposive sample of five virtual students studying Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) at the Ph.D. level in Iran. Investigating SUI in higher education among virtual TEFL Ph.D. candidates potentially contributes to demystifying a complex relationship of factors, such as cultural experiences, linguistic backgrounds, and online environment challenges. Using phenomenology, the study investigated the identities of the participants by thematically analyzing semi-structured interview data. The findings revealed the participants’ various ways of identifying with a university, the subsequent consequences of identification, and the obstacles preventing them to develop SUI. The findings indicated that several factors at play are unique to doctoral candidates. The faculty prestige, research-based concerns, and nature of online media were identified to be crucial aspects of SUI for the TEFL Ph.D. students. Universities are thus advised to provide appropriate direction for virtual candidates. The study also found that some students perceived a lack of competence in TEFL, which, in turn, acted as a barrier to their SUI. To alleviate this problem, further research needs to identify what is lacking in teacher education university programs and what initiatives are required to improve TEFL students’ professional development and help them become confident English teachers.

Salimi, E. A., & Banitalebi, Z. (2023). DEMYSTIFYING STUDENT-UNIVERSITY IDENTIFICATION AMONG VIRTUAL TEFL CANDIDATES: THE CASE OF IRAN. TEFLIN Journal, 34(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/97-115

Download Citation

Abdelmaaboud, A. K., Peña, A. I. P., & Mahrous, A. A. (2021). The influence of student-university identification on student’s advocacy intentions: The role of student satisfaction and student trust. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 31(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1768613

Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, (34)3, 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059

Ashley, L. H. (2018). Making ‘the ask’ to internal stakeholders: The influence of organizational identification on university faculty and staff giving. [Master’s thesis, Western Kentucky University]. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3061

Balaji, M. S., Roy, S. K., & Sadeque, S. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of university brand identification. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3023–3032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.017

Chatham-Carpenter, A. (2017). The future online: Instructional communication scholars taking the lead. Communication Education, 66(4), 492–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1349916

Cutri, R. M., & Mena, J. (2020). A critical reconceptualization of faculty readiness for online teaching. Distance Education, 41(3), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1763167

Dennen, V. P., & Burner, K. J. (2017). Identity, context collapse, and Facebook use in higher education: Putting presence and privacy at odds. Distance Education, 38(2), 173-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322453

Duesterhaus, A., & Duesterhaus, M. (2014). Attributes of successful university brands in the USA. Journal of Brand Strategy, 3(2), 169–183.

Eslamdoost, S., King, K. A., & Tajeddin, Z. (2020). Professional identity conflict and (re) construction among English teachers in Iran. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 19(5), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2019.1676157

Fazli-Salehi, R., Esfidani, M. R., Torres, I. M., & Zúñiga, M. A. (2019). Antecedents of students’ identification with university brands: A study on public universities in Iran. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(4), 830–854. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2018-0242

Gill, M. J. (2020). How can I study who you are? Methodological approaches to identity work research. In A. Brown (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of identities in organizations (pp. 295 – 310). Oxford University Press.

Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104

Hawass, H. H. (2020). The antecedents of student-university identification: an investigation into the Egyptian higher education sector. Middle East Journal of Management, 7(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1504/MEJM.2020.10026904

Hemmati, R., & Mahdie, A. (2020). Iranian PhD students’ experiences of their learning environment and scholarly condition: A grounded theory study. Studies in Higher Education, 45(1), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1576164

Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1.

Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 3–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1

Kaufmann, R., & Buckner, M. M. (2019). Revisiting “power in the classroom”: Exploring online learning and motivation to study course content. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1481104

Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670

Klimanova, L. (2020). The phenomenology of experiencing oneself online: Critical dimensions of identity and language use in virtual spaces. In M. R. Freiermuth, N. Zarrinabadi (Eds.), Technology and the psychology of second language learners and users, new language learning and teaching environments (pp. 279-308). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34212-8_11

Kumar, R. (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage Publications.

Li, Y. (2021). “I had so many conflicts in my mind”: Navigating the doctoral journey across languages and cultures. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.1972804

Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1999). Data logging in observation: Fieldnotes. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative research (pp. 3-12). Sage.

Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202

McAlpine, L. (2012). Identity-trajectories: Doctoral journeys from past to present to future. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 38-46.

McAlpine, L. (2017). Building on success? Future challenges for doctoral education globally. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00035

Medina-Craven, M. N., Davis, S. E., Sexton, S. M., & Cooper, D. (2020). Connecting with new business students: The role of socialization and core self-evaluations in university identification. Studies in Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1758653

Mirhosseini, S. A., & Khodakarami, S. (2015). A glimpse of contrasting de jure–De facto ELT policies in Iran. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), Language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran (pp. 23–34). British Council.

Mirhosseini, S. A., Shirazizadeh, M., & Pakizehdel, H. (2022). Bridging language education and “New Literacy Studies”: Reinvigorating courses of general English at an Iranian university. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 47(3), 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1791713

Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 51(1), 90-112. https://doi:10.1017/S0261444817000325

Rashidi, N., & Najafi, R. (2010). The representation of culture in Iran Language Institute advanced level textbooks. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(5), 624–631. https://doi:10.4304/jltr.1.5.624-631

Reedy, A. K. (2019). Rethinking online learning design to enhance the experiences of indigenous higher education students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5561

Salimi, E. A., & Abedi, H. (2022). Dual identity or identity duel: EFL context duality force on identity aspects formation through learners’ self-reflection. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 130-147. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.11303

Salimi, E. A., & Banitalebi, Z. (2023). EFL teachers’ organizational identity in online communities: The case of Iran. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(1), 89-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.1.6.89

Schlesinger, W., Cervera, A., & Pérez-Cabañero, C. (2017). Sticking with your university: The importance of satisfaction, trust, image, and shared values. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2178–2194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1136613

Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54.

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. Sage.

Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage.

Stephenson, A. L., & Yerger, D. B. (2014). Does brand identification transform alumni into university advocates? International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 11(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-014-0119-y

Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). Academic Press.

Trullas, I., Simo, P., Fusalba, O. R., Fito, A., & Sallan, J. M. (2018). Student-perceived organizational support and perceived employability in the marketing of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1488334

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Wilkins, S., Butt, M. M., Kratochvil, D., & Balakrishnan, M. S. (2016). The effects of social identification and organizational identification on student commitment, achievement and satisfaction in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(12), 2232–2252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034258

Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2013). The components of student–university identification and their impacts on the behavioural intentions of prospective students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(6), 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.844672

Wilson, J. M., Boyer O'Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979-1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607083105

Yao, Q., Martin, M. C., Yang, H. Y., & Robson, S. (2019). Does diversity hurt students’ feeling of oneness? A study of the relationships among social trust, university internal brand identification, and brand citizenship behaviors on diversifying university campuses. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 29(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1638482