INVESTIGATING LEARNER PREFERENCES FOR WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN A THAI HIGHER EDUCATION CONTEXT
Downloads
Downloads
Al-Ahmad, S., & Al-Jarrah, R. S. (2015). The impact of direct corrective feedback type on the linguistic accuracy of EFL students’ writing. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 17(2), 8–36. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/volume-17-issue-2-june-2015-quarterly-journal/index.htm
Al-Bakri, S. (2016). Written corrective feedback: Teachers’ beliefs, practices and challenges in an Omani context. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 44–73. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1207970.pdf
Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 95–127. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ944129
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
Black, D. A., & Nanni, A. (2016). Written corrective feedback: Preferences and justifications of teachers and students in a Thai context. Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-07
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 3–18). Routledge.
Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023
Fry, G. W., & Bi, H. (2013). The evolution of educational reform in Thailand: The Thai educational paradox. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 290–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311311483
German, E., & Mahmud, Y. S. (2021). Students’ perception and preference on corrective feedback in online writing classes. TESOL International Journal, 16(8), 54–71. https://www.tesol-international-journal.com/tij-16-8-2021/
Hamouda, A. (2011). A study of students and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.55 etelt.v4n3p128
Heift, T., & Hegelheimer, V. (2017). Computer-assisted corrective feedback and language learning. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 51–65). Routledge.
Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. National Conference on Research in English; ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills National Institute of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED265552.pdf
Huong, D. T. T. (2018). Teachers’ written feedback and writing performance of teacher education students. The Asian ESP Journal, 14(6), 95–120. https://www.asian-esp-journal.com/aesp-14-issue-6/
Irwin, B. (2018). Written corrective feedback Student preferences and teacher feedback practices. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.02
Jolley, K. (2019). Student perceptions of group writing processes and feedback. In F. Meunier, J. Van de Vyver, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019 (pp. 212–217). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.38.1011
Kılıçkaya, F. (2022). Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1-2), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1668811
Köksal, D., Ozdemir, E., Tercan, G., Gun, S., & Bilgin, E. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ written feedback preferences, self-efficacy beliefs and burnout levels. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 316–327. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/43366/528125
Lee, E. J. (2013). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 84, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
Morris, C., & Chikwa, G. (2016). Audio versus written feedback: Exploring learners’ preference and the impact of feedback format on students’ academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416637482
Moslemi, N., & Dastgoshadeh, A. (2017). The relationship between cognitive styles and young adult learners’ preferences for written corrective feedback. HOW, 24(2), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.24.2.338
Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., Mohebbi, H., & Masjedlou, A. P. (2017). Speaking out on behalf of the voiceless learners: Written corrective feedback for English language learners in Iran. Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 822–841. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1159905
Nurie, Y. (2018). Doctoral students’ perceived needs and preferences for supervisors’ written feedback. PASAA, 56, 112–144. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1224436
Orts, S., & Salazar, P. (2016). EFL students’ preferences towards written corrective feedback: An exploratory study on age and level of proficiency. The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies, 23, 109–129. https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v23.a8
Parkes, M., & Fletcher, P. (2017). A longitudinal, quantitative study of student attitudes towards audio feedback for assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1224810
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Qutob, M. M., & Madini, A. A. (2020). Saudi EFL learners’ preferences of the corrective feedback on written assignment. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n2p16
Reynolds, B. L., & Kao, C.-W. (2019). The effects of digital game-based instruction, teacher instruction, and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1617747
Roy, S. (2019). Exploring multilingual writers’ preference between audio and written feedback, and the impact of feedback format on their revision process in a U.S. composition class (Publication No. 13859498) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Saadat, M., Mehrpour, S., & Khajavi, Y. (2016). Internet-mediated corrective feedback for digital natives. TESOL Journal, 7(1), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.232
Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x
Shaik, N. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about child participation in Grade R. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 6(1), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v6i1.248
Shi, J., Mo, X., & Sun, Z. (2012). Content validity index in scale development. Zhong Na Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 37(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
Tasdemir, M. S., & Yalcin Arslan, F. (2018). Feedback preferences of EFL learners with respect to their learning styles. Cogent Education, 5(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1481560
Tiranant, P., Khumsat, T., Ngamnikorn, T., & Wiboolyasarin, W. (2022). Beliefs about native-speaking teachers in grammar and pronunciation instruction: Views and voices from second language learners. International Journal of Language Studies, 16(1), 45–72.
Trabelsi, S. (2019). The perceptions and preferences of the general foundation programme students regarding written corrective feedback in an Omani EFL context. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 91–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.91
Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Uzuntiryaki, E., Boz, Y., Kirbulut, D., & Bektas, O. (2010). Do pre-service chemistry teachers reflect their beliefs about constructivism in their teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 403–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9127-z
Vásquez, C., & Harvey J. (2010). Raising teachers’ awareness about corrective feedback through research replication. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375365
Wiboolyasarin, W. (2021). Written corrective feedback beliefs and practices in Thai as a foreign language context: A perspective from experienced teachers. Language Related Research, 12(3), 81–119. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.3.4
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., & Jinowat, N. (2020). Learners’ oral corrective feedback perceptions and preferences in Thai as a Foreign language tertiary setting. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 912–929. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759344
Yang, J. (2016). Learners’ oral corrective feedback preferences in relation to their cultural background, proficiency level and types of error. System, 61, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.004
Yunus, W. N. M. W. M. (2020). Written corrective feedback in English compositions: Teachers’ practices and students’ expectations. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2255
Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021). EFL students’ preferences for written corrective feedback: Do error types, language proficiency, and foreign language enjoyment matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564