EXPLORING CHANGES IN PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE AMONG LOWER-PROFICIENCY ENGLISH LEARNERS THROUGH A SELF-REFLECTION WRITING TASK (SRWT)
Downloads
This study investigates changes in productive vocabulary knowledge among pre-intermediate L1 Japanese learners of English using the Self-Reflection Writing Task (SRWT). Unlike established tasks such as the Lexical Frequency Profile (LFP; Laufer & Nation, 1995), Productive Vocabulary Levels Test (Laufer & Nation, 1999; PVLT), and Lex30 (Meara & Fitzpatrick, 2000), the SRWT requires learners to write a brief reflective text on a familiar topic related directly to their learning experiences. The study included 24 L1 Japanese learners of English enrolled in a compulsory English Communication Skills class. Participants completed the SRWT by reflecting on their final presentation performance, writing between 130-160 words. The task was repeated at the end of each study quarter (Q1, Q2, and Q3). Responses were analyzed using the new JACET8000 corpus (JACET, 2016), categorizing vocabulary as either frequent (1k) or infrequent (non-1k). The findings suggest a possible two-phase pattern in learners’ productive vocabulary development. Initially, learners appear to rely primarily on frequent (1k) vocabulary, establishing a foundational lexical base. As their vocabulary knowledge develops, they gradually begin incorporating more infrequent (non-1k) lexical items in their writing. This shift may indicate a deeper stage of vocabulary development in which learners move beyond basic lexical resources to express ideas more precisely. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening frequent vocabulary knowledge in language instruction while gradually supporting learners’ expansion toward less frequent vocabulary.
Downloads
Abu-Rabiah, E. (2025). The productive vocabulary size of second language learners upon entry into higher education. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31261/tapsla.16594
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667268
Edmonds, A., Clenton, J., & Elmetaher, H. (2022). Exploring the construct validity of tests used to assess L2 productive vocabulary knowledge. System, 108, Article 102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102855
Elmetaher, H. (2021). Investigating productive vocabulary knowledge development: A task-based approach. Studies in European and American Cultures, 28, 1-26. http://doi.org/10.15027/52374
Elmetaher, H. (2022). Exploring the extent to which productive vocabulary knowledge tasks detect changes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hiroshima University, Japan]. https://hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2033341/files/StuIntegrArtSci_3_65.pdf
Elmetaher, H. (2024). Investigating the MRVAT sensitivity in detecting changes in the first 2000 most frequent words in the new JACET8000. Korea TESOL Journal, 20(1), 85-106.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2007). Productive vocabulary tests and the search for concurrent validity. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 116-132). Cambridge University Press.
Gu, P. (2019). Strategies for learning vocabulary. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 271-287). Routledge.
Horst, M., & Collins, L. (2006). From faible to strong: How does their vocabulary grow? The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 63(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.83
JACET (2016). Basic vocabulary for Japanese university students New JACET8000. https://language.sakura.ne.jp/s/voc.html
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47
Jiang, N. (2002). Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 617-637. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004047
Jiang, N. (2004). Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 4, 416-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00238.x
Kiss, G., Armstrong, C., Milroy, R., & Piper, J. (1973). An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. Aitken, R. Bailey, & N. Hamilton-Smith (Eds.), The computer and literary studies (pp. 153-165). Edinburgh University Press.
Laufer, B. (1994). The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time? RELC Journal, 25(2), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829402500202
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103
Lee, S. (2025). The relationship between receptive and productive knowledge of L2 English collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 109-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12605
Lou, X., Wu, C., & Ma, G. (2026). Longitudinal profiling of Chinese EFL learners' lexical frequency in writing. Arab World English Journal, 17(2), 290–309. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol17no2.19
Meara, P., & Alcoy, J. C. (2010). Words as species: An alternative approach to estimating productive vocabulary size. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 222-236. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/item/217
Meara, P., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2000). Lex30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System, 28(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00058-5
Min, C., & Li, D. (2025). From words to writing: Vocabulary growth and its impact on L2 composition over time. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251412208
Miralpeix, I. (2019). L1 and L2 vocabulary size and growth. Routledge.
Nation, P. (1984). Vocabulary lists: Words, affixes, and stems. Victoria University of Wellington.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2017). The BNC/COCA Level 6 word family lists (Version 1.0.0) [Data file]. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation.aspx
Nation, P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Heinle.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary knowledge and use. Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. (2012). Piloting vocabulary tests. In G. Fulcher, & F. Davidson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 307-320). Routledge.
Schmitt, N. (2019). Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 52(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000053
Stæhr, L. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577-607. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109990039
Walters, J. (2012). Aspects of validity of a test of productive vocabulary: Lex30. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.625579
Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263105050023
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of synonymy on second-language vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(2), 120–136. http://www2.hawaii.edu/~readfl/rfl/October2007/webb/webb.pdf
Webb, S. (2009). The effects of receptive and productive learning of word pairs on vocabulary knowledge. RELC Journal, 40(3), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688209343854
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
