THE PARADOX OF CHATGPT DEPENDENCE: NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON ACADEMIC READING, RESEARCH SKILL AND ACADEMIC WRITING
Downloads
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has revolutionized learning practices, yet its impacts on academic competencies remain an area of exploration. This study employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), combining reflective and formative measurement models, to investigate the correlation among ChatGPT usage, English academic reading, research skill, and English academic writing. A total of 284 postgraduate students majoring in linguistics and English education across five universities in Indonesia participated. The participants selected through purposive sampling completed an online questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. Findings reveal negative correlation between ChatGPT usage and English academic writing. It implies that ChatGPT alone does not directly enhance the academic writing proficiency of graduate students. The result also shows an unexpected yet significant negative correlation between ChatGPT usage and both English academic reading (β = -0.175, p = 0.017) and research skill (β = -0.164, p = 0.015), suggesting that over-reliance on AI-assisted tools may hinder critical engagement and skill development. Conversely, academic reading (β = 0.640, p = 0.000) demonstrates the strongest influence on academic writing, showing the necessity of cultivating strong reading competencies to enhance scholarly output. These results indicate a pressing need for a balanced approach to AI integration in academic settings, requiring students to actively engage with research materials rather than relying solely on AI-generated content. By fostering academic literacy and research-driven methodologies, educators can mitigate the adverse effects of ChatGPT dependence while maximizing the potential of AI as a supplementary tool. This study contributes to the discourse on AI-driven education, emphasizing the nuanced role of technology in shaping academic literacy and research proficiency.
Downloads
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Ramos Farroñan, E. V., Villena Zapata, L. I., Mogollon Garcia, F. S., Rabanal-León, H. C., Morales Angaspilco, J. E., & Bocanegra, J. C. S. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in university contexts: A conceptual analysis based on UTAUT2 theory. Heliyon, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38315
Al-Hammadi, F., & Sidek, H. M. (2015). An analytical framework for analysing secondary EFL writing curriculum: Approaches for writing and preparation for higher education. International Education Studies, 8(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n1p59
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
Anik, M. H., Raaz, S. N. C., & Khan, N. (2025). Embracing AI assistants: Unraveling young researchers’ journey with ChatGPT in science education thesis writing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00438-6
Apriani, E., Hamidah Daulay, S., Aprilia, F., Gafur Marzuki, A., Warsah, I., Supardan, D., & Muthmainnah. (2025). A mixed-method study on the effectiveness of using ChatGPT in academic writing and students’ perceived experiences. Journal of Language and Education, 11(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.17913
Ardi, P., Amalia, S. N., Widiati, U., Walker, D., & Prihandoko, L. A. (2024). Writing enjoyment among EFL postgraduate students in Indonesia: The interplay between students’ writing self-efficacy and research literacy and teachers’ immediacy and clarity. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 632–661. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270437
Atayeva, M., Putro, N. H. P. S., Kassymova, G., & Kosbay, S. (2019, November). Impact of reading on students’ writing ability. Materials of International Practical Internet Conference “Challenges of Science, 144(2), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.31643/2019.001
Badley, G. (2009). Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902757294
Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2023). Conceptualizing self-regulated reading-to-write in ESL/EFL writing and investigating its relationships to motivation and writing competence. Language Teaching Research, 27(5), 1193–1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820971740
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Brown, J. D. (2002). The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 6(1), 17–18. https://teval.jalt.org/test/PDF/Brown13.pdf
Cahyono, B. Y., Irawati, R., Amalia, S. N., & Hidayat, L. E. (2024). Project-based learning in EFL educational settings: A meta-analysis study in EFL/ESL writing. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.01.04
Castillo-González, W., Lepez, C. O., & Bonardi, M. C. (2022). Chat GPT: A promising tool for academic editing. Data and Metadata, 1, 23. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202223
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Research competencies to develop academic reading and writing: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.576961
Chea, P., & Xiao, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The power and damage of AI-assisted tools on academic English reading skills. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 3(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v3i3.242
Ciraso-Calí, A., Martínez-Fernández, J. R., París-Mañas, G., Sánchez-Martí, A., & García-Ravidá, L. B. (2022). The research competence: Acquisition and development among undergraduates in education sciences. Frontiers in Education, 7, 836165. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.836165
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers and Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224
Deng, Y., Lei, J., Jin, T., & Chen, J. (2024). Developing genre awareness in collaborative academic reading: A case study of novice academic learners. English for Specific Purposes, 74, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.11.001
Eriksson, L. (2023a). Difficulties in academic reading for EFL students: An initial investigation. Language Teaching, 56(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000246
Eriksson, L. (2023b). “Gruelling to read”: Swedish university students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards academic reading in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101265
Evans, N. W., Anderson, N. J., & Eggington, W. G. (Eds.) (2015). ESL readers and writers in higher education: Understanding challenges, providing support. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762654
Frye, B. L. (2022). Should using an AI text generator to produce academic writing be plagiarism? Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 33(4), Article 5. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol33/iss4/5
Giray, L. (2024). Negative effects of generative AI on researchers: Publishing addiction, Dunning-Kruger effect and skill erosion. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.38
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2016). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Language Teaching, 49(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000082
Hair, J. F., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Harshalatha, S., & Sreenivasulu, Y. (2025). Investigating the language issues in academic writing: A study on the research scholars at VIT University-Vellore. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(4), 2025157. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025157
Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2010). Research self-efficacy, publication output, and early career development. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(7), 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011079978
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Huamani-Anco, Y. S., & Maraza-Quispe, B. (2025). Evaluation of the impact of ChatGPT on the development of research skills in secondary education students: An experimental approach. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.1.2218
Islam, I., & Islam, M. N. (2024). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academia. Discover Education, 3(1), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00114-w
Ketchen, D. J. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
Khlaif, Z. N., Mousa, A., Hattab, M. K., Itmazi, J., Hassan, A. A., Sanmugam, M., & Ayyoub, A. (2023). The potential and concerns of using AI in scientific research: ChatGPT performance evaluation. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e47049. https://doi.org/10.2196/47049
Kim, J. H., Kim, J., Baek, T. H., & Kim, C. (2025). ChatGPT personalized and humorous recommendations. Annals of Tourism Research, 110, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103857
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Artificial intelligence creates plagiarism or academic research? European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(6), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(6).18
Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798
Li, Y., Sadiq, G., Qambar, G., & Zheng, P. (2025). The impact of students’ use of ChatGPT on their research skills: The mediating effects of autonomous motivation, engagement, and self-directed learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 13073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13303-9
Linuwih, E. R. (2021). The effectiveness of extensive reading in improving EFL academic writing. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i1.514
Livberber, T., & Ayvaz, S. (2023). The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Mahande, R. D., Fakhri, M. M., Suwahyu, I., & Sulaiman, D. R. A. (2025). Unveiling the impact of ChatGPT: Investigating self-efficacy, anxiety and motivation on student performance in blended learning environments. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2024-0372
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600–3606. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_718_23
Mudhsh, B. A., Muqaibal, M. H., Al-Maashani, S., & Al-Raimi, M. (2025). Utilization of artificial intelligence tools in fostering English grammar and vocabulary among Omani EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 15(5), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n5p51
Naznin, K., Al Mahmud, A., Nguyen, M. T., & Chua, C. (2025). ChatGPT integration in higher education for personalized learning, academic writing, and coding tasks: A systematic review. Computers, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020053
Nejadghanbar, H., Atai, M. R., & Snow, C. (2022). Exploring the academic reading challenges of graduate students of applied linguistics. Iberica, 44, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.44.315
Nemt-allah, M., Khalifa, W., Badawy, M., Elbably, Y., & Ibrahim, A. (2024). Validating the ChatGPT Usage Scale: Psychometric properties and factor structures among postgraduate students. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 497. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01983-4
Niloy, A. C., Akter, S., Sultana, N., Sultana, J., & Rahman, S. I. U. (2024). Is ChatGPT a menace for creative writing ability? An experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12929
Nurkamto, J., Prihandoko, L. A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Purwati, O. (2024). Academic writing apprehension in higher education: A systematic review. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.28928
Phyo, W. M., Nikolov, M., & Hódi, Á. (2024). Exploring the interplay of English academic reading and writing proficiency among international doctoral students. Heliyon, 10(14). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34598
Prihandoko, L. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of academic reading and research competence on academic writing: A multi-regression analysis among EFL undergraduates. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(1), 451. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.9738
Rahman, M., Terano, H. J. R., Rahman, N., Salamzadeh, A., & Rahaman, S. (2023). ChatGPT and academic research: A review and recommendations based on practical examples. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v3i1.175
Rezaei, M., Salehi, H., & Tabatabaei, O. (2024). ChatGPT, a helpful scaffold or a debilitating crutch for academic writing? 11th International and the 17th National Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching, ICeLeT 2024, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeT62507.2024.10493087
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of Market Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Songkram, N., Chootongchai, S., Keereerat, C., & Songkram, N. (2025). Potential of ChatGPT in academic research: Exploring innovative thinking skills. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(2), 1689–1711. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2375342
Strzelecki, A. (2024). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5142–5155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Tobler, S. (2024). Context matters: Interpreting effect sizes in education meaningfully. MethodsX, 13, 103023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.103023
Tsai, C. Y., Lin, Y. T., & Brown, I. K. (2024). Impacts of ChatGPT-assisted writing for EFL English majors: Feasibility and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 22427–22445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12722-y
Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, Indrawati, I., Rusdin, D., Ivone, F. M., Basthomi, Y., & Zulfahreza. (2024). Revolutionizing EFL writing: Unveiling the strategic use of ChatGPT by Indonesian master’s students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2399431. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2399431
Xu, T., & Jumaat, N. F. (2024). ChatGPT-Empowered writing strategies in EFL students’ academic writing: Calibre, challenges and chances. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(15), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i15.49219
Yuan, Y., Li, H., & Sawaengdist, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: Opportunities and challenges in education. Language Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2023-0006
Zangrossi, P., Martini, M., Guerrini, F., de Bonis, P., & Spena, G. (2024). Large language model, AI and scientific research: Why ChatGPT is only the beginning. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences, 68(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06171-4
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article no. 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhao, D. (2025). The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: An analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8055–8086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5
Zheng, X., & Fan, H. (2024). Exploration of the effectiveness and experience of AI-assisted academic reading. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1041
Copyright (c) 2026 Lastika Ary Prihandoko, Joko Nurkamto, Djatmika, Utami Widiati, Siti Muniroh, Nur Hayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
